Before the beginning: the ring tetralogico.

The social sciences have had to acquire from the structured sciences and technically more advanced, what physics, mathematics, genetics, biology and computer science, the picture of reference of their activity, turns more to the individualization of functional models that to descriptions fenomenologiche, to structural investigations more than to answers criticisms, to the problems set by the complex societies. The point of departure of the theory that is

enunciated in this writing is the synthesis of a global theory, a theory" universal", able to give not account some single event on the plan of the articulated composition of the forms of the being, on the contrary of the useful bases for every social discipline and in particolar way for" to see" the active principle of the being what evolutionary phenomenon. In fact, the interaction among the being and his to be revealed himself/herself/themselves in how much such (cfr. the form) it is not anything else other than the interaction between the being and the duty-being. The limits there are well clear: what we see it is not for instance so much the evolution, how much the reconstruction that we make some evolutionary phenomenon: the observer cannot be separate dall' observation. But despite this, he doesn't slip in the doubt. In fact, the reconstruction always gives us an interpretation of the reality, that has stung strong, that you/they push us to an ontological reflection. The evolution of the ring tetralogico and, therefore, of the being, what value entropico, is an universal that emerges from the study of the structure of the being and it is, therefore, an universal ontological that

owes to be considered from whatever serious reflection in theme of creation of the value sintropico. Le structured sciences they become" mimesis" of the reality and the ring tetralogico imitates only the reality in the measure in which it recreates her/it through forms sintropiche: the mhutos, the value.